Molecular Orbital Theory — π Systems
Ethylene · Acetylene · Benzene | HF/STO-3G & B3LYP/3-21G | Undergraduate General Chemistry
Ethylene — C₂H₄
Ethylene contains a C=C double bond consisting of one σ bond and one π bond. It has 8 valence electrons occupying 4 molecular orbitals (MOs 3–8 are the valence MOs; MOs 1–2 are C 1s core).
The highest occupied MO is MO 8 (π, A″ symmetry) — the π bond formed by overlap of the two carbon pz orbitals perpendicular to the molecular plane.
The lowest unoccupied MO is MO 9 (π*, A″) — the antibonding π* orbital with a nodal plane between the carbons.
| σ (MO 3) | ½ × (2 − 0) | = | 1 |
| π (MO 8) | ½ × (2 − 0) | = | 1 |
| Total C=C bond order | 2 | ||
Ethylene — Molecular Orbital Energies
Acetylene — C₂H₂
Acetylene has a C≡C triple bond: one σ bond and two degenerate π bonds. With 7 occupied MOs, the two HOMOs are MO 6 and MO 7 (both π, degenerate at −0.349 au) — one in the xz plane and one in the yz plane.
These two perpendicular π bonds together form a cylindrical electron cloud around the C≡C axis, characteristic of the linear geometry.
The LUMOs are MO 8 and MO 9 (π*, degenerate at +0.397 au), the antibonding counterparts.
| σ (MO 5) | ½ × (2 − 0) | = | 1 |
| π (MO 6) | ½ × (2 − 0) | = | 1 |
| π (MO 7) | ½ × (2 − 0) | = | 1 |
| Total C≡C bond order | 3 | ||
Acetylene — Molecular Orbital Energies
Benzene — C₆H₆
Benzene has 21 occupied MOs (6 C 1s core + 15 valence). The six carbon pz orbitals combine to form 6 π MOs: three bonding and three antibonding.
MO 12 is a σ C–H bonding orbital delocalized over the ring.
MO 14 is a σ C–C bonding orbital. These represent the σ framework holding the ring together.
MO 17 (a2u) is the fully bonding π MO with no nodal planes through the ring — all pz lobes in phase.
MO 23 (e2u) is the π* LUMO, degenerate with MO 22 (+0.005 au), with three nodal planes through the ring.
MO 27 (e2u) is a higher π* antibonding virtual orbital with three nodal planes.
All 6 π electrons are delocalized over the entire ring, giving a π bond order of 1.5 per C–C bond, consistent with equal bond lengths.
| σ framework | 1 per C–C bond | 1.0 |
| π contribution | 6 π e⁻ ÷ (2 × 6 bonds) | 0.5 |
| Total C–C bond order | 1.5 | |
Benzene — Selected MO Energies (MOs 12, 14, 17, 20/21, 22/23, 27)
Comparison — Ethylene, Acetylene & Benzene
| Property | Ethylene C₂H₄ |
Acetylene C₂H₂ |
Benzene C₆H₆ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level of theory | HF/STO-3G | HF/STO-3G | B3LYP/3-21G |
| Total occupied MOs | 8 | 7 | 21 |
| Number of π bonds | 1 | 2 (degenerate) | 3 (delocalized) |
| π electrons | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| HOMO symmetry | A″ (π) | Πᵤ (π, ×2) | e₁g (π, ×2) |
| HOMO energy | −0.324 au | −0.349 au | −0.252 au (MO 20/21) |
| LUMO symmetry | A″ (π*) | Πg (π*, ×2) | e₂u (π*, ×2) — MO 22/23 |
| LUMO energy | +0.319 au | +0.397 au | +0.005 au |
| HOMO–LUMO gap | 0.643 au (17.5 eV) | 0.746 au (20.3 eV) | 0.258 au (7.0 eV) ★ |
| C–C bond order | 2.0 (double) | 3.0 (triple) | 1.5 (aromatic) |
| Geometry | Planar, sp² | Linear, sp | Planar, sp² |
| Aromaticity | No | No | Yes (4n+2, n=1) |
| Interactive model | Open ↗ | Open ↗ | Open ↗ |
| ★ | Benzene's small HOMO–LUMO gap (relative to the other two) reflects its aromatic stabilization and explains its characteristic UV absorption and reactivity patterns. | au = atomic units (Hartrees); 1 au ≈ 27.21 eV. |
| Aspect | HF/STO-3G (ethylene, acetylene) |
B3LYP/3-21G (benzene) |
|---|---|---|
| Method type | Ab initio (Hartree-Fock) | DFT (Density Functional Theory) |
| Electron correlation | ✗ Ignored | ✓ Included (approximately) |
| Basis set flexibility | Minimal — 1 function per orbital | Split-valence — 2 functions per valence orbital |
| Bond length accuracy | Usually too short | Close to experiment |
| Orbital energies | Systematically too negative | More physically meaningful |
| Computational cost | Very fast | Moderate |
| MO shapes & ordering | Both give correct qualitative MO topology — suitable for understanding bonding, nodes, and symmetry | |
| ⚠ | Because ethylene/acetylene use HF/STO-3G and benzene uses B3LYP/3-21G, their orbital energies cannot be directly compared. For a fair numerical comparison all molecules should be calculated at the same level of theory. |